This sample represents the diagnostic methodology used to assess vendor governance and regulatory alignment across multiple jurisdictions.
The Cross-Jurisdiction Risk Diagnostic delivers a 48-hour compliance snapshot designed for financial institutions operating under RBI, GDPR, HKMA, and FFIEC oversight.
Each report provides a concise view of:
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Entity Type | Mid-size NBFC (India) |
| Vendor Count Reviewed | 12 Active Vendors |
| Jurisdictions Covered | India, EU, Singapore |
| Core Focus Area | Vendor Compliance and IT Outsourcing |
| Diagnostic Duration | 48 Hours |
| Risk Category | Weight | Score | Rating | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Stability | 25% | 78 | Moderate liquidity risk due to revenue concentration | |
| Operational Resilience | 30% | 85 | Documented BCP, limited dependency on key personnel | |
| Compliance History | 20% | 64 | Partial adherence to RBI outsourcing clause requirements | |
| Cybersecurity Posture | 25% | 59 | Incomplete data protection policy; lacks breach reporting mechanism |
Overall RAG Rating:
Your vendor ecosystem demonstrates moderate risk exposure. Immediate improvement is recommended in cybersecurity documentation and compliance record management.
| Regulatory Domain | Region | Observation | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBI (India) | IT Outsourcing Directions 2023 | Missing vendor BCP test documentation | High |
| GDPR (EU) | Article 28 (Processor Agreements) | Vendor contracts lack explicit data breach notification timelines | Medium |
| FFIEC (US) | Information Security Standards | Absence of periodic control validation reports | Medium |
| HKMA (Hong Kong) | Risk Management Principles | No documented vendor exit strategy for critical vendors | Low |
Summary:
4 out of 10 vendor agreements show regulatory gaps that could attract penalties during audit.
The majority are procedural (documentation-based) and can be remediated quickly with structured templates.
| Priority | Category | Recommendation | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | Cybersecurity | Implement breach response documentation and internal incident escalation SOP | Strengthened cyber resilience; audit readiness |
| Medium | Compliance | Add mandatory outsourcing and inspection clauses in vendor contracts | Avoid potential RBI compliance penalties |
| Low | Governance | Introduce quarterly vendor review meetings with documented minutes | Improved oversight and traceability |
Sample visualization included in the full diagnostic report.
Each vendor receives a color-coded risk map with weighted scoring and jurisdictional notes for leadership review.
When you engage in the full Cross-Jurisdiction Risk Diagnostic, you get:
All diagnostics are performed under strict confidentiality.
Client data and assessments are secured using bank-grade encryption and handled per ISO 27001 and SOC 2 principles.
Finology Nexus guarantees data privacy, precision in risk evaluation, and on-time delivery.
This sample report is for demonstration purposes only and does not represent any specific organization or regulatory advice.
For full diagnostic results, tailored recommendations, and official compliance mapping, please contact:
Take the first step toward audit-ready vendor governance.
Request your 48-hour diagnostic today and receive your full RAG report within two business days.
📥 Book Diagnostic 📄 Download Full Framework Overview